U.S. govt: Foreigners with risk of Ebola are safe to cross the border, but unvaccinated U.S. children are a threat to public health
by Mike Adams
NaturalNews.com
Monday, October 06, 2014
Right now is the perfect time to point out the gross contradiction in the U.S. government’s policies on supposedly preventing the spread of communicable disease. Across the board, children who are unvaccinated against diseases that don’t even exist in America anymore – such as polio — are loudly condemned as “a threat to public health” and often barred from attending public school.
The logic goes like this: An unvaccinated child might easily catch polio and then spread it to other children. Therefore, that child should be barred from attending public school.
But all the logic gets reversed when it comes to ebola and the U.S. southern border. Suddenly, anyone who says the border should be controlled so that ebola-infected illegal immigrants can’t enter the United States are called “alarmists” or “racists.” Apparently, the idea that an ebola-infected illegal alien might expose others to ebola is now politically incorrect.
Never mind the fact that border agents are catching border crossers who recently came from ebola-infected countries. As reported by Top Right News: [1]
Agents are reporting that they have caught hundreds of illegal aliens crossing our Southern border from African Ebola “hot zones” over the past several months, the majority of them from Liberia… DHS figures indicate that 112 individuals were caught illegally crossing into the United States from Guinea, 231 from Liberia, and another 145 from Sierra Leone, the three Ebola “hot spots”. This represents a 95% increase over 2013, before the Ebola crisis heated up.
Ebola is now more common in America than polio
The Rest…HERE
