Dr. Craig Spencer: Ebola? Flu? Hospital food ? Nothing?
By Jon Rappoport
Jonrappoport.wordpress.com
October 29, 2014
Let’s see. Dr. Craig Spencer comes back from Guinea, where he’s been treating patients. In NYC, he takes the subway, he goes bowling, he eats at restaurants, he jogs.
He begins feeling fatigued, he takes his temp. 100.3.
He makes a call. The hazmat army arrives and rushes him to Bellevue.
The doctors announce: Ebola.
On what basis?
Unknown.
What specific diagnostic tests did they run?
Unknown.
Can we examine those tests, in great detail, and the results? Fat chance.
Was Spencer given an antibody test? It’s notorious for coming up with false-positives, because it reacts on the basis of factors that have nothing to do with the virus being tested for.
And even if that doesn’t happen, an antibody test says nothing about whether the patient is sick, has been sick, or will get sick. It merely indicates he had come in contact with the virus.
Traditionally, a positive antibody test was taken to mean the person’s immune system warded off the virus successfully. Not any longer. The science has been turned upside down, for no good reason. Now, a positive test=the patient has the disease. Absurd.
Was Spencer given a PCR test? Also notorious for errors, and coming up with irrelevant findings, the PCR, even if done perfectly, says nothing about whether the patient has enough of a given virus in his body to cause illness. The PCR works with miniscule amounts of sample-material from the patient.
Was the Ebola virus actually isolated directly from Spencer’s blood? No reason to think so. This necessary test is rarely done. And on top of that, there should also be a titer test, which indicates how much of a given virus is in the patient’s body—because there must be millions and millions of active virus present to even begin to say it can cause illness. The titer test is almost never done.
Without proper diagnostic tests, there is no reason under the sun to say Spencer “has Ebola.”
Fatigue? 100.3 temperature? There are thousands of possible reasons for those symptoms.
We do know the CDC favors the PCR test, which it ran on the Dallas “Ebola” patient. Again, it is unreliable, useless, and misleading.
The Rest…HERE
