Environmental Extremists + ATF = Total Ammunition Ban

Tuesday, January 29, 2013
By Paul Martin

AmmoLand.com
Tuesday, January 29, 2013

San Diego, CA –(Ammoland.com)- There are two more regulatory storm fronts moving in that may make it difficult or impossible to get the ammunition that firearm owners need to defend themselves and their families, and to engage in the shooting sports.
The uncoordinated attacks come separately from neo-enviro groups and from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. But taken together, these two separate proposals from these two separate groups create a perfect storm that could potentially result in an absolute ban on almost all ammunition.

How?
The extremist environmental groups are trying to ban lead ammunition. Federal law already bans the use of lead ammunition to take water fowl, but these groups will not be satisfied until all lead ammunition use is prohibited. They claim that the minuscule levels of lead introduced into the environment by hunters causes harm to persons and wildlife (most notably the California condor). This junk science resulted in the state legislature passing a ban on lead ammunition in central California. Not content with leaving ammunition banned within California borders, the groups have expanded their push to ban lead ammunition into other states and at the federal level.

The Rest…HERE

One Response to “Environmental Extremists + ATF = Total Ammunition Ban”

  1. Patrick

    Well, I watched the Gun Violence hearings on Cspan today and the one thing I took out of this circus is that Gabrielle Gifford is faking her injuries. I have worked around many people with brain trama in my life and its quite clear to me that Gifford and her Husband are a disgrace to this country and are fully bought and paid for. I fully believe that once she is behind closed doors she is as normal as everyone else. I would like a news agency to investigate the care takers at the hospitals she stayed at to see whats happened to their bank accounts and whether or not they were forced to sign federal non-disclosier agreements.

    #178225

Leave a Reply

Calendar