Is the Zika virus ‘epidemic’ being used to cover up vaccine-induced miscarriages and birth defects?
by: Harold Shaw
NaturalNews.com
February 11, 2016
Although wonderful for many women, pregnancy comes with a great responsibility. Especially in an age when scientific research is often manipulated for the sake of profit, a mother-to-be is faced with a set of very difficult choices in order to keep herself and her baby healthy. One of these choices involves the controversial vaccinations that are pushed down on pregnant women by public health officials and obstetricians.
Several of these vaccines are known to cause miscarriages and birth defects. Sounds familiar? The recent Zika virus “epidemic” displays a similar profile. So far, it’s been claimed that pregnant women who are contaminated with the virus are at a higher risk of miscarriage, while the virus itself has been publicly linked to a birth defect called microcephaly. But is it possible that that Zika is being used to cover up vaccine injury in pregnant women?
Poorly tested vaccines and a “healthy pregnancy”
Ever since the 1970s, industry-influenced public health officials have recommended the experimental influenza vaccine for pregnant women in their second or third trimester, but obstetricians generally oppose it so as to avoid any potential toxic exposure that could interfere with the normal development of the baby.
In 2006, the CDC strongly insisted that all pregnant women should take the vaccine, regardless of their health. In 2011, an untested pertussis Tdap vaccine was also recommended for pregnant women. All of a sudden, vaccination during pregnancy was deemed “safe.” despite a complete lack of evidence.
The Rest…HERE
