Editorial Says Govt. Would Defeat Armed Rebellion by Making Major Cities Disappear
Goodbye, Dallas. You’re next, Atlanta. Armed resistance to demonic monsters who would do this is futile, so why even try? Right?
By David Codrea
AmmoLand.com
November 10, 2015
USA – -(Ammoland.com)- “The idea of ‘armed rebellion’ in the U.S. is ludicrous,” opinion column writer Gregg Littell declares in The Union.
His stated intent is to debunk Ben Carson’s claim that “America will never suffer under tyranny because the people are armed.”
The reason, according to “gun owner and target shooter” Littell, is because unlike in Revolutionary War times, “the arms disparity between a ‘tyrannical government’ and citizens is so huge that the idea of ‘armed rebellion’ is ludicrous.”
He keeps using that word. After reading the rest of his insane rant, an Inigo Montoya line comes to mind. Because in the past, when subjected to “Resistance is futile” Borg declarations from “progressive” keyboard commandos pointing out the government, after all, has nukes, I’ve noted none of them ever seem to go beyond that platitude and flesh out the full scenario for us.
Refreshingly, Littell has no problem going full totalitarian:
Assuming the military was part of the tyranny (which it would have to be for tyranny to have any meaning), any rebelling national band of “patriots” would be told something like, “you either lay down your arms or the entire city of Dallas, Texas will disappear. You have one hour. If you continue, the next city to disappear will be Atlanta, Georgia.”
The Rest…HERE
