This of course doesn’t rule out the possibility of intentional misapplication or malignant and purposeful misinterpretation by an overly-politicized justice-department opinion to the white house on the limits of presidential power. Nor of course does this mean this administration won’t just do exactly what I said then whitewash, obfuscate, confuse the matter or the truth, sealed because of “national security” interests, or other myriad ta less-than-ethical tactics. I don’t blame republicans or democrats. I blame Washington DC as a whole.

My question is, who’s interests? Most Americans DO NOT approve of this. Nor do most Americans approve of a few other recent congresses, senates, presidents, and houses of representation (if you count the citizens that don’t vote) because of disenfranchisement by a fraudulent two-party duopoly, a hegelian dialectic…or citizens disenfranchised because the electoral college is a total farce that divides up the country worse than a risk board in a winner-takes all system, including voters that didn’t perhaps vote for the state electoral winner, or worse, didn’t vote at all. What happened to AT MOST, 50k people per rep? Wasn’t lack of representation one of the defining issues of the American Revolution, or should I say The First Great British-American Secession?

The other one was not gun confiscation, but the notion by the british that they didn’t have to confiscate guns to begin the process of further subjugating the colonists, they needed only to confiscate and ban ammo to turn the colonists weapons into mere clubs. We see a dire movement in that very direction today. And all this liberty, purchased for the illusion and theater of “security”

No one is secure in his liberties who gives them up for the comfort of a boot on his neck.

Necessity has always been the plea of tyrants. A kick to the proverbial curb the response from people tired of listening to such “pleas” with weapons pointed in their face “for their own good.”