Federal judge BLOCKS California’s high-capacity ammunition ban because it is unconstitutional

Saturday, March 30, 2019
By Paul Martin

On Friday San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez ruled California’s law against high-capacity gun magazines was unconstitutional
California law has prohibited buying or selling of magazines with over 10 rounds since 2000, but those who had them before then were allowed to keep them
In 2016, the Legislature and voters approved a law removing that provision
The California arm of the National Rifle Association then sued and Benitez sided with the group’s argument, in defense of the right to bear arms
He cited stories of three women confronted by armed intruders in their homes
One woman who had a high capacity magazine was able to kill one of the three armed intruders, scare the others off, and call for help at the same time
The other two women ran out of bullets during the home attack

DAILYMAIL.COM
30 March 2019

A federal judge declared California’s ban on high-capacity gun magazines over 10 rounds as unconstitutional on Friday, following a lawsuit by the state’s arm of the National Rifle Association.

On Friday San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez ruled the law against high-capacity gun magazines was unconstitutional, blocking the state from enforcing the voter-approved ban outlined California’s Proposition 63.

The proposition was made to prevent the use of such magazines, which are often used in mass shootings and got passed on the November 8, 2016 ballot.

California law has prohibited buying or selling of magazines with over 10 rounds since 2000, but those who had them before then were allowed to keep them.

In 2016, the Legislature and voters approved a law removing that provision.

The California arm of the National Rifle Association then sued and Benitez sided with the group’s argument that banning the magazines infringes on the Second Amendment right to bear arms.

‘Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts,’ Benitez wrote in his 86-page order as he declared the law to be unconstitutional, granting a summary judgement in favor of gun owner Virginia Duncan and the California Pistol & Rifle Association.

Benitez cited the stories of three women who were at their homes in Florida and Georgia and were shot by gun-weilding intruders who broke into their homes.

He suggested that the women were unable to stop the assailants because they had lower capacity guns to defend themselves.

In one case a pajama-clad woman who had a high-capacity magazine attached to her weapon was able to take on three armed intruders, while simultaneously calling for help on her phone.

In the other two cases the women without additional ammunition ran out of bullets.

‘She had no place to carry an extra magazine and no way to reload because her left hand held the phone with which she was still trying to call 911,’ the judge wrote, saying she killed one attacker while two escaped.

Chuck Michel, an attorney for the NRA and the California Rifle & Pistol Association, said the judge’s latest ruling may go much farther by striking down the entire ban, allowing individuals to legally acquire high-capacity magazines for the first time in nearly two decades.

The Rest…HERE

Comments are closed.

Join the revolution in 2018. Revolution Radio is 100% volunteer ran. Any contributions are greatly appreciated. God bless!

Follow us on Twitter