Judges Continue War on U.S. Sovereignty: Gang Fears, Domestic Violence Now Asylum Claims
by R. Cort Kirkwood
TheNewAmerican.com
Thursday, 20 December 2018
The radical Left and its sympathetic judges continued their assault on American sovereignty this week with rulings to stop the Trump administration from tightening the rules that govern who can apply for and receive asylum in the United States.
The practical result is that just about any human being on the planet can claim asylum and receive a lengthy hearing that will, effectively, make removing such a person well-nigh impossible.
The first ruling overturned the administration’s policy that tightened the requirements for a “refugee” to succeed in a claim of “credible fear” of violence or persecution in one’s home country.
The second ruling cemented a temporary ban on the president’s policy to refuse asylum claims from illegal aliens who jump the border between legal ports of entry.
Anonymous Plaintiffs
The newer of the two rulings came from the bench of Judge Emmet Sullivan of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.
He ruled that the administration had wrongfully deported a group of anonymous plaintiffs, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, of course, who sought asylum because they feared being killed.
The American officials who heard the plaintiffs’ “harrowing” tale, Sullivan ruled, decided incorrectly — pursuant to a policy established by former U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions — that the plaintiffs did not merit asylum.
In June, Sessions reversed a decision granting asylum to a woman who had fled her violent husband because membership in a “particular social group” was not what invited her husband’s attacks. Domestic violence, Sessions said, was not a legitimate plea for asylum. The usual hysteria followed. Sessions put the United States back in the “Dark Ages.” But the policy also applied to those claiming fear of gangs.
The judge noted that Sessions “specifically stated that few claims pertaining to domestic or gang violence by non-governmental actors could qualify for asylum or satisfy the credible fear standard” that governs such claims.
Sullivan said Sessions’ policy is illegal because it trepasses U.S. law governing asylum claims as well as international law on refugees. The hearing officers, he wrote, thought the plaintiffs’ claims were credible, but turned down asylum because of the policy.
Thus, Sullivan “permanently enjoins the government from continuing to apply those policies and from removing plaintiffs who are currently in the United States without first providing credible fear determinations consistent with the immigration laws.” As well, he ordered “the government to return to the United States the plaintiffs who were unlawfully deported and to provide them with new credible fear determinations consistent with the immigration laws.”
In other words, any woman who crosses the border with a black eye, a sniffling child, and a tearful tale of a crazy husband must now be permitted an asylum claim. And any man who says a gang is after him can claim asylum, too.
Come on in, the Borders Are Open
But Sullivan only finished what began out on the left coast. Yesterday, Judge Jon Tigar of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California continued his war against a sane immigration policy.
The Rest…HERE
