America Deserves To Know If Democrats Used Taxpayer Money To Fund Spy Ring In Trump Campaign
You can try to split this as you may, whether this is an investigation or surveillance but from Trump’s standpoint there is a legitimate issue. You can tell a victim that this isn’t a mugging, it’s just a forced divestiture, but it sure feels like a mugging unless you can prove to the contrary.
ONAN COCA
FREEDOMOUTPOST.COM
MAY 23, 2018
If you’re watching events unfold in the mainstream media, you’re probably getting confused.
Based on what they’re reporting in the newspapers and on the TV screen, it sure seems like the Trump campaign was being spied on with a variety of different resources including moles embedded within the campaign (also phone taps, FISA warrants, and international agencies ). However, in the same breath these same media outlets are telling us not to be too concerned that things really aren’t as bad as they seem. On TV they interview Democrats like Adam Schiff(D-CA) who says spying on Trump “simply didn’t happen,” even as we learn that it did.
So what is going on?
How can the media tell us in one breath that there were various methods of “observation” happening, and in the next breath try to explain how that is not actually “spying.”
Liberal law professor Jonathan Turley explains that the Trump administration is right to be concerned about the activities of the intelligence community during the 2016 election.
Here’s what he told Fox News’ Tucker Carlson:
Tucker Carlson: Do Americans have a right to know if they were spied on and why?
Jonathan Turley: I think that they do. These are very serious allegations and they are unprecedented. We don’t know what the truth is. Maybe there was a valid reason for the investigation, maybe they used valid means. But we should want to know.
I think what is being a case of willful blindness here is that we have confirmation that Trump was apparently correct when he said over a year ago that he had people in his campaign that were under surveillance and it turns out it was much broader than we thought. Even though people like [Former DNI James] Clapper and others in the Obama administration denied it, it does appear to be a surveillance program, it does appear to be an investigation and now you have an individual who reportedly offered to be an advisor in a campaign when he was an asset for the FBI or the CIA or both. I can’t imagine what Justice official would sign off on that.
Now you can try to split this as you may, whether this is an investigation or surveillance but from Trump’s standpoint there is a legitimate issue. You can tell a victim that this isn’t a mugging, it’s just a forced divestiture, but it sure feels like a mugging unless you can prove to the contrary.
The Rest…HERE
