In-Depth Analysis Kills Russian Hacking Narrative, Shows DNC Planted Fake Evidence
Kim Dotcom tweeted out an extensive analysis showing evidence of DNC/Crowdstrike planting fake hacking evidence to push fake Russiagate narrative.
By Jay Syrmopoulos
TheFreeThoughtProject.com
July 23, 2017
Washington, D.C. – A damning new technical analysis reveals that files stolen from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) during the 2016 election cycle were most likely downloaded to a USB drive by someone with physical access to a computer connected to the DNC network. The analysis refutes the official narrative of the files being hacked remotely by the Russians – as popularized by the U.S. corporate media, without any actual evidence ever publicly presented.
The alleged DNC hacker, Guccifer 2.0, in an interview with Motherboard in June 2016, claimed he used a zero-day exploit to bypass security on the DNC servers and steal files, which he subsequently published under the title “NGP-VAN.”
While the DNC leak was quickly attributed to the Russian hackers by U.S. intelligence agencies, a document published by an individual going by the name Forensicator reveals how the 7-zip file published by Guccifer 2.0 was transferred at a speed of 23 MB/s, making it “unlikely that this initial data transfer could have been done remotely over the Internet.”
“The initial copying activity was likely done from a computer system that had direct access to the data,” the report from the Forensicator stated.> “By ‘direct access’ we mean that the individual who was collecting the data either had physical access to the computer where the data was stored, or the data was copied over a local high speed network (LAN).”
The Rest…HERE