Expelling Russian Diplomats Didn’t Give Obama the Expected Russian Reaction
By Dave Hodges
TheCommonSenseShow.com
December 30th, 2016
Obama has expelled 35 senior diplomats from the United States. Is the US cutting off diplomatic relations? Is war at hand?
What Does It Mean?
Often times, when the diplomats are expelled by a host country, diplomatic relations are nearing an end and war may not be far off. I know that when it was announced, yesterday, many of us in the Independent Media had some fear and trepidation that war could be close. However, with perspective of time to judgethis event, it is clear that we are looking at the selling of a lie to the American people.
Personally, I breathed a sigh of relief when I came to understand that Russia’s ambassador to the United States, Sergei Kislyak, will not be one of those Russian diplomats expelled by Obama.
President Obama’s Action Is Part of a Major Obama Coverup
The expelling of the senior Russian diplomats comes on the heels of the CIA and FBI conclusion that Russia was responsible for hacking the DNC and releasing controversial emails, which highlited criminal behavior, on the part of Clinton and related associates. The purpose of the hack, according to the Obama administration, was done with the intention of helping Donald Trump to win the 2016 Presidential election.
The CIA Has Directly Interfered In At Least 81 Elections
The U.S. has a very long and shameful history of attempting to influence and bully various presidential elections in foreign countries. According to Dov Levin of Carnegie Mellon University, the USA has interfered in foreign election 81 times between the years of 1946 and 2000. Levin has maintained a database on the topic.
Levin is quick to point out that the 81 incidences does not include military coups, forced regime change, both violent and nonviolent. The number is also not included in U.S. efforts following the election of candidates the U.S. didn’t like, to force the elected and undesirable candidates from power. Some examples of this type of interference would include Iran, Guatemala and Chile. Nor does this 81 number include general assistance with the electoral process, such as election monitoring and getting out the vote efforts. Finally, the number does not include efforts at promoting propaganda designed to influence an election which is what the United States is formally accusing Russia of doing.
It is interesting to note that the information obtained from Dr. Levin’s analyses came from the mainstream media’s LA Times which is a well-known propagandist for the establishment. If the MSM is printing this information which casts serious doubt on the authenticity of Obama’s actions towards Russia, then how can any American take Obama seriously when it comes to allegations of Russian hacking?
As dig deeper into the so-called reasons for Obama’s provocative actions, the facts, the substance and the logic of the President’s actions quickly breakdown with regard to the integrity of yesterday’s actions.
Aiding and Abetting Criminal Behavior
The Rest…HERE
