DNC rigging of support for Hillary Clinton is identical to the way universities collude with corporations like Monsanto
by: J. D. Heyes
NaturalNews.com
Tuesday, August 02, 2016
Tens of millions of American voters just learned during the current presidential election cycle that the Democratic National Committee’s rules for nominating the party’s White House candidate aren’t fair. And what’s more, they learned that the party clearly favored one competitor – Hillary Clinton – over another, Sen. Bernie Sanders.
The way that Democrats ensured a Clinton victory was a lot like the way Monsanto ensures that the health and safety of its genetically modified seeds and crops are never seriously challenged or questioned in the scientific realm. I’ll explain.
Take the case of Clinton winning her party’s nomination. From the outset, the Sanders campaign was doomed. The Democratic Party, like the Republican Party, holds a series of nominating primaries and caucuses ostensibly to select their respective presidential candidates.
It’s important to note that the difference between primaries and caucuses is that in the former, voters statewide cast ballots to elect their preferred candidate; the latter is a system of local gatherings where voters decide which candidate to support and select delegates for nominating conventions.
Republicans select delegates; Democrats select delegates and so-called “superdelegates.” And these superdelegates are free to support any candidate they choose, irrespective of the wishes of voters in their districts.
‘A solid return on investment’
The Rest…HERE
