Crime prediction software used to prosecute people for misdeeds they have yet to commit
by: S. Johnson
NaturalNews.com
Monday, March 21, 2016
Are people responsible for actions they have yet to commit? This moral dilemma doesn’t just make for fun armchair philosophy. A team of researchers has demonstrated that computers are better than human judges at predicting who will commit a violent act.
In a paper published last month, the researchers detailed how they created a system that began with people who had been previously arrested for domestic violence, and determined which participants would most likely commit the same crime later.
Authorities can use the crime prediction software to detect patterns. These patterns can help officials recognize a criminal’s intent and the probability that they will commit the same act twice. The technology could prevent injuries and even save lives. On the other hand, critics note that such technology is corrosive to the foundations of justice and moral responsibility.
In response, proponents insist that police departments already use computers to decipher when and where crimes are most likely to occur. More than half of state parole boards use predictions based on data analysis to determine whether a convict should be released from prison or remain incarcerated. In addition, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security already uses FAST (Future Attribute Screening Technology) to pinpoint potential terrorists, by analyzing an individual’s body language and tendencies. The most recent system is simply an add-on to these technologies.
The Rest…HERE
