Why are HIV carriers with no symptoms considered criminals, while Ebola carriers with no symptoms are called ‘virus-free’?
by: Ethan A. Huff
NaturalNews.com
Tuesday, January 26, 2016
If Ebola really is as dangerous as the mainstream media continues to claim it is, then why are possible Ebola carriers like nurse Kaci Hickox being treated as “virus-free” while HIV carriers continue to be prosecuted as criminals?
In case you weren’t aware, individuals diagnosed as HIV-positive — that is, people who show signs of HIV antibodies — can be prosecuted for infecting others with the virus, even if transmission was accidental.
Many an HIV-positive individual has served a prison sentence for allegedly infecting someone else with the virus, even when symptoms weren’t present or they weren’t even that they had the condition. In some cases, prosecuted individuals said to be HIV-positive may not have actually had the disease in the first place, as the most common testing methods aren’t foolproof.
There’s been much controversy, in fact, over HIV diagnoses and how these are used to prosecute people who may not be guilty of any actual crimes. Like Ebola, HIV isn’t fully understood by the medical profession, and there’s still plenty of debate over whether or not it’s even a real disease in the way most people think of it.
Ebola appears more unpredictable, deadly than HIV
The Rest…HERE
