Houston police admit they’re not able to protect citizens; the beginning of the end of public police protection is here
by: J. D. Heyes
NaturalNews.com
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
About a decade ago, the U.S. Supreme Court decided a landmark case that many believed would have major implications for public safety.
In June 2005, the high court – in overturning a lower court’s ruling – said that local police had no constitutional duty to protect and serve the communities that pay them, including a woman who had obtained a court-issued order of protection that required police to arrest a violent husband who had violated the decree.
As reported by The New York Times, the majority decision, which was written by Justice Antonin Scalia with dissenting opinions from Justices John Paul Stevens and Ruth Bader Ginsberg, overturned an appeals court ruling that permitted a lawsuit to proceed against the city of Castle Rock, Colorado, for the failure of police to respond to a woman’s call for help after her estranged husband violated a protective order and kidnapped their three young girls. He eventually killed all three of them.
Walked right through her order of protection
The Rest…HERE
